Snus is a moist powder tobacco item that is placed below the upper lip for extended periods. It is mainly preferred in Sweden, Denmark and Norway, exactly where it is legal and thought of an helpful harm reduction item. In truth, snus has not only led to Sweden boasting the lowest smoking prices in Europe, but additional importantly, also to reporting the lowest prices of lung cancer across the continent.
Meanwhile a study from Rutgers University released earlier this year, had indicated that regrettably, the predicament in the US is distinctive. Regardless of proof to the contrary, the researchers had located that most American smokers nevertheless think that snus is as damaging as combustible tobacco.
The study titled “Smokers’ perceptions of dangers and harm from snus relative to cigarettes: A latent profile evaluation study”, had analysed the responses of 256 smokers in relation to their perceptions about the dangers of establishing lung cancer, heart illness and oral cancer when making use of snus versus cigarettes.
Sadly, only about 17% had accurately stated that snus has reduce dangers for lung cancer, with 45% incorrectly saying that snus was equally or additional damaging for all 3 illness-dangers, and 38% saying that snus carried enhanced dangers for oral cancer only.
The NNA urges the EU to comply with suit
A press release by the New Nicotine Alliance (NNA) has welcomed the improvement in the US and urges the European Union to abandon its “archaic and indefensible ban” on snus and comply with suit.
“..the EU is wedded to an out-of-date, unscientific and consequently indefensible ban on goods which are 99% safer than smoking, though enabling cigarettes to be sold everywhere.”
“It is inexplicable why the EU continues to perpetuate the ban on European smokers deciding on to switch to snus,” stated Mark Oates from the NNA. “Not only is the sale of snus permitted in the USA but they have now permitted 1 business to make the undisputed claim that ‘using snus as an alternative of cigarettes puts you at a reduce threat of mouth cancer, heart illness, lung cancer, stroke, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis’, the distinction in strategy could not be additional stark, and it is the EU which is becoming reckless with its public’s wellness, not America.”
“The FDA has recognized that there is a continuum of threat surrounding nicotine use and that snus is at the extremely low finish of that,” Oates continued, “this selection is a welcome game-changer as it acknowledges, pretty rightly, that safer nicotine goods can provide fantastic possible for smokers who want to switch from smoking to a safer option.”
“Public perception is important, and the US has decided that messaging conveying the relative threat of nicotine goods is important data that can provide fantastic added benefits to advancement of public wellness. By contrast, the EU is wedded to an out-of-date, unscientific and consequently indefensible ban on goods which are 99% safer than smoking, though enabling cigarettes to be sold everywhere.”
There is “no valid purpose for snus to be prohibited”
Oates concluded by pointing out that the snus ban just does not make sense. “It is effectively previous time that the EU stepped out of the 80s and followed the lead of the FDA. There is basically no valid purpose for snus to be prohibited in the EU, it is a shameful dereliction of duty which really should be overturned at the 1st chance.”